Chip comparison
Meta MTIA v2 vs Tenstorrent Wormhole
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | Meta MTIA v2 | Tenstorrent Wormhole |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | TSMC N5 | GlobalFoundries 12nm |
| TDP | 90 W | 160 W |
| Memory | 128 GB LPDDR5 | 12 GB GDDR6 |
| Memory bandwidth | 205 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
| FP16 (dense) | — | 148 TFLOPS |
| INT8 (dense) | 708 TOPS | 590 TOPS |
| Form factor | PCIe (internal Meta) | PCIe (n300, n150) |
| Announced | 2024-04-10 | 2024-07-01 |
| Released | 2024-05-01 | 2024-08-01 |
Robots running Meta MTIA v2
No robots publicly running it yet.
Robots running Tenstorrent Wormhole
No robots publicly running it yet.
Data centers with Meta MTIA v2
Data centers with Tenstorrent Wormhole
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Common questions
Meta MTIA v2 vs Tenstorrent Wormhole: which has more memory?
Meta MTIA v2 carries more HBM (Meta MTIA v2: 128 GB LPDDR5; Tenstorrent Wormhole: 12 GB GDDR6). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.
Meta MTIA v2 vs Tenstorrent Wormhole: which is more widely used?
Meta MTIA v2: 0 robots and 2 data centers publicly running it. Tenstorrent Wormhole: 0 robots and 0 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.
See also: every chip comparison · Meta MTIA v2 full page · Tenstorrent Wormhole full page.