Chip comparison
NVIDIA A10 Tensor Core GPU vs Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2)
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | NVIDIA A10 Tensor Core GPU | Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2) |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | Samsung 8N | Samsung 7LPP |
| Transistors (B) | 28.3 | — |
| Die size | 628 mm² | — |
| TDP | 150 W | 90 W |
| Memory | 24 GB GDDR6 | 16 GB GDDR6 |
| Memory bandwidth | 600 GB/s | — |
| FP16 (dense) | 125 TFLOPS | — |
| BF16 (dense) | 125 TFLOPS | — |
| INT8 (dense) | 250 TOPS | 300 TOPS |
| Form factor | PCIe | Auto-board (dual-SoC) |
| Announced | 2021-04-12 | 2023-01-01 |
| Released | 2021-04-12 | 2023-02-01 |
Robots running NVIDIA A10 Tensor Core GPU
No robots publicly running it yet.
Robots running Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2)
Data centers with NVIDIA A10 Tensor Core GPU
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Data centers with Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2)
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Common questions
NVIDIA A10 Tensor Core GPU vs Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): which has more memory?
NVIDIA A10 Tensor Core GPU carries more HBM (NVIDIA A10 Tensor Core GPU: 24 GB GDDR6; Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): 16 GB GDDR6). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.
NVIDIA A10 Tensor Core GPU vs Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): which is more widely used?
NVIDIA A10 Tensor Core GPU: 0 robots and 0 data centers publicly running it. Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): 3 robots and 0 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.
See also: every chip comparison · NVIDIA A10 Tensor Core GPU full page · Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2) full page.