Data center comparison
AirTrunk OSK2 vs AirTrunk TOK2
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| AirTrunk OSK2 | AirTrunk TOK2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Energized capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Announced-to-energized gap | not recorded | not recorded |
| Lifecycle | announced | under construction |
| Developer | AirTrunk | AirTrunk |
| Location | Osaka, Japan (Kansai International Airport) | Tokyo, Japan |
| Grid | not recorded | not recorded |
| Acreage | not recorded | not recorded |
On the map
Common questions
Which is further along, AirTrunk OSK2 or AirTrunk TOK2?
AirTrunk OSK2 is announced; AirTrunk TOK2 is under construction. Energized capacity: not recorded versus not recorded. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Where are AirTrunk OSK2 and AirTrunk TOK2?
AirTrunk OSK2 is in Osaka, Japan (Kansai International Airport); AirTrunk TOK2 is in Tokyo, Japan. Each record on DEPLOY is sourced and dated.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.