Data center comparison
AirTrunk SYD2 vs AirTrunk TOK2
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| AirTrunk SYD2 | AirTrunk TOK2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Energized capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Announced-to-energized gap | not recorded | not recorded |
| Lifecycle | energized | under construction |
| Developer | AirTrunk | AirTrunk |
| Location | Sydney, Australia | Tokyo, Japan |
| Grid | not recorded | not recorded |
| Acreage | not recorded | not recorded |
On the map
Common questions
Which is further along, AirTrunk SYD2 or AirTrunk TOK2?
AirTrunk SYD2 is energized; AirTrunk TOK2 is under construction. Energized capacity: not recorded versus not recorded. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Where are AirTrunk SYD2 and AirTrunk TOK2?
AirTrunk SYD2 is in Sydney, Australia; AirTrunk TOK2 is in Tokyo, Japan. Each record on DEPLOY is sourced and dated.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.