Data center comparison
Khazna QAJ1 Ajman AI-Optimized Data Center vs Microsoft Fairwater Data Center
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| Khazna QAJ1 Ajman AI-Optimized Data Center | Microsoft Fairwater Data Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | 0.10 GW | 0.45 GW |
| Energized capacity | not recorded | 0.37 GW |
| Announced-to-energized gap | 0.10 GW | 0.08 GW |
| Lifecycle | under construction | partially energized |
| Developer | Khazna Data Centers | Microsoft / OpenAI |
| Location | Ajman, Ajman, United Arab Emirates | Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, United States |
| Grid | other | MISO |
| Acreage | not recorded | not recorded |
On the map
Common questions
Which is bigger, Khazna QAJ1 Ajman AI-Optimized Data Center or Microsoft Fairwater Data Center?
By announced capacity, Microsoft Fairwater Data Center is larger: 0.45 GW versus 0.10 GW. Announced figures are claims, not built capacity.
Which is further along, Khazna QAJ1 Ajman AI-Optimized Data Center or Microsoft Fairwater Data Center?
Khazna QAJ1 Ajman AI-Optimized Data Center is under construction; Microsoft Fairwater Data Center is partially energized. Energized capacity: not recorded versus 0.37 GW. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Where are Khazna QAJ1 Ajman AI-Optimized Data Center and Microsoft Fairwater Data Center?
Khazna QAJ1 Ajman AI-Optimized Data Center is in Ajman, Ajman, United Arab Emirates; Microsoft Fairwater Data Center is in Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, United States. Each record on DEPLOY is sourced and dated.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.