Data center comparison
BT-owned UK sites vs Cobalt Park
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| BT-owned UK sites | Cobalt Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Energized capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Announced-to-energized gap | not recorded | not recorded |
| Lifecycle | announced | announced |
| Developer | Nscale | Nscale |
| Location | Multiple, Global | Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom |
| Grid | not recorded | not recorded |
| Acreage | not recorded | not recorded |
Common questions
Which is further along, BT-owned UK sites or Cobalt Park?
BT-owned UK sites is announced; Cobalt Park is announced. Energized capacity: not recorded versus not recorded. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Where are BT-owned UK sites and Cobalt Park?
BT-owned UK sites is in Multiple, Global; Cobalt Park is in Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. Each record on DEPLOY is sourced and dated.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.