Chip comparison
AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | AMD Instinct MI300X | NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | TSMC N5 + N6 (chiplet) | Samsung 8N |
| Transistors (B) | 153 | — |
| TDP | 750 W | 60 W |
| Memory | 192 GB HBM3 | 64 GB LPDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 5,300 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s |
| FP16 (dense) | 1,307 TFLOPS | — |
| BF16 (dense) | 1,307 TFLOPS | — |
| FP8 (dense) | 2,614 TFLOPS | — |
| INT8 (dense) | 2,614 TOPS | 275 TOPS |
| Launch price (list) | $15,000 | — |
| Form factor | OAM | Module (AGX Orin 64GB) |
| Announced | 2023-12-06 | 2022-03-22 |
| Released | 2024-01-01 | 2022-07-01 |
Robots running AMD Instinct MI300X
No robots publicly running it yet.
Robots running NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin
Data centers with AMD Instinct MI300X
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Data centers with NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Common questions
AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin: which has more memory?
AMD Instinct MI300X carries more HBM (AMD Instinct MI300X: 192 GB HBM3; NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin: 64 GB LPDDR5). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.
AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin: which is more widely used?
AMD Instinct MI300X: 0 robots and 0 data centers publicly running it. NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin: 9 robots and 0 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.
See also: every chip comparison · AMD Instinct MI300X full page · NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin full page.