Chip comparison
Cambricon MLU370-X8 vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | Cambricon MLU370-X8 | NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | TSMC N7 | Samsung 8N |
| TDP | 250 W | 60 W |
| Memory | 48 GB LPDDR5 | 64 GB LPDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | — | 204.8 GB/s |
| FP16 (dense) | 96 TFLOPS | — |
| INT8 (dense) | 256 TOPS | 275 TOPS |
| Form factor | PCIe | Module (AGX Orin 64GB) |
| Announced | 2022-03-25 | 2022-03-22 |
| Released | — | 2022-07-01 |
Robots running Cambricon MLU370-X8
No robots publicly running it yet.
Robots running NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin
Data centers with Cambricon MLU370-X8
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Data centers with NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Common questions
Cambricon MLU370-X8 vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin: which has more memory?
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin carries more HBM (Cambricon MLU370-X8: 48 GB LPDDR5; NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin: 64 GB LPDDR5). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.
Cambricon MLU370-X8 vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin: which is more widely used?
Cambricon MLU370-X8: 0 robots and 0 data centers publicly running it. NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin: 9 robots and 0 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.
See also: every chip comparison · Cambricon MLU370-X8 full page · NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin full page.