DEPLOYDatabase

Chip comparison

Groq LPU (Language Processing Unit) vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin

Side-by-side specs

Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.

FieldGroq LPU (Language Processing Unit)NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin
Process nodeGlobalFoundries 14nmSamsung 8N
TDP375 W60 W
Memory0.23 GB SRAM (230 MB on-die)64 GB LPDDR5
Memory bandwidth80,000 GB/s204.8 GB/s
FP16 (dense)188 TFLOPS
INT8 (dense)750 TOPS275 TOPS
Form factorPCIe (GroqCard) / rack-scale GroqRackModule (AGX Orin 64GB)
Announced2020-01-012022-03-22
Released2021-06-012022-07-01

Robots running Groq LPU (Language Processing Unit)

No robots publicly running it yet.

Data centers with Groq LPU (Language Processing Unit)

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Data centers with NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Common questions

Groq LPU (Language Processing Unit) vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin: which has more memory?

NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin carries more HBM (Groq LPU (Language Processing Unit): 0.23 GB SRAM (230 MB on-die); NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin: 64 GB LPDDR5). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.

Groq LPU (Language Processing Unit) vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin: which is more widely used?

Groq LPU (Language Processing Unit): 0 robots and 0 data centers publicly running it. NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin: 9 robots and 0 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.

See also: every chip comparison · Groq LPU (Language Processing Unit) full page · NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin full page.