Chip comparison
Huawei Ascend 910B vs Meta MTIA v2
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | Huawei Ascend 910B | Meta MTIA v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | SMIC N+2 (~7nm) | TSMC N5 |
| TDP | 400 W | 90 W |
| Memory | 64 GB HBM2e | 128 GB LPDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 1,600 GB/s | 205 GB/s |
| FP16 (dense) | 400 TFLOPS | — |
| BF16 (dense) | 400 TFLOPS | — |
| INT8 (dense) | 800 TOPS | 708 TOPS |
| Form factor | OAM (Atlas 300T A2) | PCIe (internal Meta) |
| Announced | 2023-08-01 | 2024-04-10 |
| Released | 2023-08-01 | 2024-05-01 |
Robots running Huawei Ascend 910B
Robots running Meta MTIA v2
No robots publicly running it yet.
Data centers with Huawei Ascend 910B
Data centers with Meta MTIA v2
Common questions
Huawei Ascend 910B vs Meta MTIA v2: which has more memory?
Meta MTIA v2 carries more HBM (Huawei Ascend 910B: 64 GB HBM2e; Meta MTIA v2: 128 GB LPDDR5). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.
Huawei Ascend 910B vs Meta MTIA v2: which is more widely used?
Huawei Ascend 910B: 2 robots and 1 data center publicly running it. Meta MTIA v2: 0 robots and 2 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.
See also: every chip comparison · Huawei Ascend 910B full page · Meta MTIA v2 full page.