Chip comparison
Meta MTIA v2 vs NVIDIA GB300 (Blackwell Ultra)
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | Meta MTIA v2 | NVIDIA GB300 (Blackwell Ultra) |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | TSMC N5 | TSMC 4NP |
| TDP | 90 W | 1400 W |
| Memory | 128 GB LPDDR5 | 288 GB HBM3e |
| Memory bandwidth | 205 GB/s | 8,000 GB/s |
| FP8 (dense) | — | 5,000 TFLOPS |
| INT8 (dense) | 708 TOPS | — |
| Form factor | PCIe (internal Meta) | Superchip (Blackwell Ultra + Grace) |
| Announced | 2024-04-10 | 2025-03-18 |
| Released | 2024-05-01 | 2025-11-01 |
Robots running Meta MTIA v2
No robots publicly running it yet.
Robots running NVIDIA GB300 (Blackwell Ultra)
No robots publicly running it yet.
Data centers with Meta MTIA v2
Data centers with NVIDIA GB300 (Blackwell Ultra)
Common questions
Meta MTIA v2 vs NVIDIA GB300 (Blackwell Ultra): which has more memory?
NVIDIA GB300 (Blackwell Ultra) carries more HBM (Meta MTIA v2: 128 GB LPDDR5; NVIDIA GB300 (Blackwell Ultra): 288 GB HBM3e). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.
Meta MTIA v2 vs NVIDIA GB300 (Blackwell Ultra): which is more widely used?
Meta MTIA v2: 0 robots and 2 data centers publicly running it. NVIDIA GB300 (Blackwell Ultra): 0 robots and 1 data center. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.
See also: every chip comparison · Meta MTIA v2 full page · NVIDIA GB300 (Blackwell Ultra) full page.