Chip comparison
Meta MTIA v2 vs SambaNova SN40L
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | Meta MTIA v2 | SambaNova SN40L |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | TSMC N5 | TSMC N5 |
| TDP | 90 W | 700 W |
| Memory | 128 GB LPDDR5 | 1500 GB DDR5 (three-tier: 64 MB SRAM + 64 GB HBM3 + 1.5 TB DDR5) |
| Memory bandwidth | 205 GB/s | — |
| FP16 (dense) | — | 638 TFLOPS |
| FP8 (dense) | — | 1,250 TFLOPS |
| INT8 (dense) | 708 TOPS | — |
| Form factor | PCIe (internal Meta) | PCIe (SN40L DataScale system) |
| Announced | 2024-04-10 | 2023-09-19 |
| Released | 2024-05-01 | 2024-01-01 |
Robots running Meta MTIA v2
No robots publicly running it yet.
Robots running SambaNova SN40L
No robots publicly running it yet.
Data centers with Meta MTIA v2
Data centers with SambaNova SN40L
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Common questions
Meta MTIA v2 vs SambaNova SN40L: which has more memory?
SambaNova SN40L carries more HBM (Meta MTIA v2: 128 GB LPDDR5; SambaNova SN40L: 1500 GB DDR5 (three-tier: 64 MB SRAM + 64 GB HBM3 + 1.5 TB DDR5)). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.
Meta MTIA v2 vs SambaNova SN40L: which is more widely used?
Meta MTIA v2: 0 robots and 2 data centers publicly running it. SambaNova SN40L: 0 robots and 0 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.
See also: every chip comparison · Meta MTIA v2 full page · SambaNova SN40L full page.