Data center comparison
Loughton vs Narvik
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| Loughton | Narvik | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Energized capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Announced-to-energized gap | not recorded | not recorded |
| Lifecycle | under construction | energized |
| Developer | Nscale | Nscale |
| Location | Loughton, Essex, United Kingdom | Narvik, Nordland, Norway |
| Grid | not recorded | not recorded |
| Acreage | not recorded | not recorded |
On the map
Common questions
Which is further along, Loughton or Narvik?
Loughton is under construction; Narvik is energized. Energized capacity: not recorded versus not recorded. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Where are Loughton and Narvik?
Loughton is in Loughton, Essex, United Kingdom; Narvik is in Narvik, Nordland, Norway. Each record on DEPLOY is sourced and dated.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.