DEPLOYregistry

Figure vs Tesla Optimus: A Verified Humanoid Comparison (2026)

Figure’s humanoid and Tesla’s Optimus are two of the most-watched humanoid robot programs in the world. This is a side-by-side of what each has verifiably deployed, drawn from the DEPLOY registry, with company claims labeled as claims, because here the gap between claim and verified reality is unusually wide.

The short version: very different evidence levels. Figure has a documented, external factory deployment at a BMW plant. Tesla’s Optimus, despite enormous attention and ambitious production targets, has no verified external deployment: as of early 2026 its robots operate inside Tesla’s own facilities in a learning and data-collection phase, and Tesla’s CEO stated in January 2026 that zero Optimus units were yet doing useful work. The two are at genuinely different points on the path from prototype to deployment.

Where Tesla Optimus stands out. Tesla’s advantages are prospective and large: it began mass-production tooling for Optimus at its Fremont factory in January 2026, targets a one-million-unit annual capacity, and can draw on its vehicle-manufacturing scale and AI stack. If Optimus reaches real productive work, Tesla’s manufacturing capacity could allow it to scale faster than any rival. The bet is on scale; the work itself is not yet demonstrated.

Where Figure stands out. Figure’s advantage is evidence: an actual humanoid doing actual work at an external customer site (BMW), which Optimus does not yet have. Figure raised over $1 billion at a roughly $39 billion valuation and runs its own Helix AI and BotQ manufacturing. On the specific question of verified deployment, Figure is ahead today.

What to watch. Whether Tesla converts its manufacturing scale into Optimus’s first verified external deployment; whether Figure scales beyond its anchor partner; and how the two compare once both have robots doing real, sourced work. The comparison below tracks the verified state and will update as the registry does.

Figures are drawn from the DEPLOY registry. Operational and financial figures stated by the companies are labeled as company-stated. See how we verify.

Side-by-side comparison of Figure and Tesla Optimus humanoid programs
AttributeFigure AIHumanoidTesla OptimusHumanoid
CategoryVerified
Humanoid
Verified
Humanoid
RobotVerifiedVerified
Verified external deploymentVerified
Figure 02 at BMW Spartanburg
Company-claimed
None. Internal learning phase only at Tesla facilities; CEO stated zero Optimus units yet doing "useful work" (Jan 2026).
company-stated, Jan 2026
Maturity stageVerified
Production
Verified
Prototype
Funding / backingCompany-claimed
~$1.7B raised, ~$39B valuation
company-stated
Company-claimed
Public (TSLA); $20B+ 2026 Optimus capex target
company-stated
ManufacturingVerified
BotQ facility (Figure-operated)
Company-claimed
Fremont line; 1M-unit/yr annual capacity target
company-stated
In-house AICompany-claimed
Helix (vision-language-action)
company-stated
Company-claimed
FSD-derived stack
company-stated
Verified deployments (registry)Verified
1
Verified
0
Incidents (registry)Verified
0
Verified
0

See also: all verified humanoid companies, Figure vs Apptronik, Waymo vs Tesla·Accountability: incidents.