Incident · Other
Class action (Lomeli v. WHOOP) alleges health-data sharing without consent
Lomeli v. WHOOP, Inc., No. 3:25-cv-06828-KAW (N.D. Cal.), filed Aug 13 2025, alleges a third-party Segment tracker in the WHOOP app disclosed health data and video-viewing history without consent, alleging VPPA + California CMIA violations. Distinct from the BPI advertising suit (Rowe). Active litigation; allegations unproven. A data-privacy datapoint relevant to the trust/insurance use case.
Occurred 2025-08-13 · Whoop (5.0 / MG) · Whoop
How to read this record
Incident records on DEPLOY are compiled from public sources (regulatory filings, news reports, and operator disclosures) and reflect what has been reported and tracked to date. They are not legal findings, determinations of fault, or safety ratings, and may be updated as new information is verified. See the sources below for the underlying references.Machine-readable surfaces
- Markdown mirror: /incidents/whoop-data-privacy-class-action-lomeli-2025.md
- JSON-LD: embedded in this page’s head
- REST API: /v1/incidents/402b5399-4cbb-44a0-bcea-4b80c468fb1f
- Data documentation: /data
- Query this programmatically: Deploy MCP
Outcomes (1)
- financial lossreported
Revision history (1)
- 2026-06-05 · outcome_class
Outcome rows carry verification_posture independently. Revision events carry basis (verified_court_filing, verified_insurance, reported_press, estimate, undisclosed). The framework records outcomes only when verifiable; absence is honest absence, not a claim of no-impact.
Sources (2)
- Milberg · https://milberg.com/news/whoop-health-privacy-lawsuit/
- ClassAction.org (complaint) · https://www.classaction.org/media/lomeli-v-whoop-inc.pdf
Common questions
- What happened in Class action (Lomeli v. WHOOP) alleges health-data sharing without consent?
- Lomeli v. WHOOP, Inc., No. 3:25-cv-06828-KAW (N.D. Cal.), filed Aug 13 2025, alleges a third-party Segment tracker in the WHOOP app disclosed health data and video-viewing history without consent, alleging VPPA + California CMIA violations. Distinct from the BPI advertising suit (Rowe). Active litigation; allegations unproven. A data-privacy datapoint relevant to the trust/insurance use case.
- When did this incident occur?
- The incident is recorded as occurring on August 13, 2025 on the DEPLOY registry. The date reflects the underlying real-world event, not the registry record's creation date.
- What robot was involved in Class action (Lomeli v. WHOOP) alleges health-data sharing without consent?
- Whoop (5.0 / MG) by Whoop is the recorded robot involved in this incident.
- Has anyone responded to Class action (Lomeli v. WHOOP) alleges health-data sharing without consent?
- No responses to this incident are recorded on the DEPLOY registry. Operators, manufacturers, or affected parties can submit responses to the editorial team; absence is not a guarantee no response was issued.
- What is the current status of Class action (Lomeli v. WHOOP) alleges health-data sharing without consent?
- This incident is an active record on the DEPLOY registry; no retraction or correction has been issued.
Methodology: Verified · 2 sources (no primary) · last reviewed 2026-06-24
Verification posture
Verified
Low confidence
Review state
Stable
Last reviewed 2026-06-24
Sources by quality tier
- 2
- unclassified
- Unclassified source
The framework is documented at /methodology. Corrections at /corrections. Reviewer: DEPLOY editorial team.
Methodology surface for Class action (Lomeli v. WHOOP) alleges health-data sharing without consent.Deploy Watch
Track this incident.
We notify you when the regulator updates the record, the remedy status changes, or a related incident surfaces.
Canonical ID 402b5399-4cbb-44a0-bcea-4b80c468fb1f