Deploy Watch
Track CloudHQ on Deploy.
We notify you when a verified state change lands on the record, not when the company issues a claim.
Key facts
Headquarters
Status
Type
Current leadership (1)
- Hossein Fateh CEOsecondary-verified
Safety record
No incidents on record for CloudHQ.
Only active incidents are counted. Retracted incidents are excluded from this summary but remain reachable at their canonical URLs.
Full safety record: incidents, sourcing, and exposure data →
CloudHQ on the data-center map
Every verified data center CloudHQ operates that has a mapped coordinate (14 total). Filled circles are Tier-2 facilities and Tier-1 campuses under this operator; click any pin to open its record.
CloudHQ data centers (14)
- CloudHQ Ashburn (Loudoun County Parkway)Ashburn · planned
- CloudHQ LC2Ashburn · operating
- CloudHQ LC3Ashburn · operating
- CloudHQ LC5Ashburn · operating
- CloudHQ Louisville Data CenterLouisville · under construction
- CloudHQ San Antonio CampusSan Antonio · 600 MW
- CloudHQ Mount Prospect Technology CampusMount Prospect · 252 MW
- CloudHQ MSP CampusChaska · 200 MW
- CloudHQ MSP Chaska CampusChaska · 200 MW
- CloudHQ LC4Ashburn · 180 MW
- CloudHQ LC1Ashburn · 144 MW
- CloudHQ CLP CampusCulpeper · 142 MW
AI data centers CloudHQ operates or is a party to, from the DEPLOY data center registry.
Financial state
- Reporting basis
- aggregator_estimate
- Lifecycle stage
- early
- Counterparty risk class
- unknown
Each numeric field carries its own basis marker. Aggregators report a number; this surface preserves the source class so verification depth travels with the value.
Recent activity
Every change to this record is dated, sourced, and independently verified where marked.
- Record createdAug 19, 2026
Added to the verified registry
Common questions
What is CloudHQ?
What does CloudHQ make?
Is CloudHQ publicly traded?
How can I invest in CloudHQ?
Where is CloudHQ headquartered?
Who owns CloudHQ?
Is CloudHQ a top robotics company?
Is CloudHQ safe?
Methodology: Claimed (not independently verified) · no sources on file · last reviewed 2026-08-21
Verification posture
Claimed (not independently verified)
Low confidence
Review state
Stable
Last reviewed 2026-08-21
The framework is documented at /methodology. Corrections at /corrections. Reviewer: DEPLOY editorial team.
Methodology surface for CloudHQ.Machine-readable surfaces
- Markdown mirror: /companies/cloudhq.md
- RSS feed: /companies/cloudhq/feed.xml
- JSON-LD: embedded in this page’s head
- REST API: /v1/companies/7c77a77b-eca5-4921-9f87-5f64431cc9eb
- Revision history: /companies/cloudhq/history
- Data documentation: /data
- Query this programmatically: Deploy MCP
Heat Index
Serious50/100
A composite of competitive footprint, funding, press velocity, active partnerships, and supply-chain edges. Different from the Intelligence score below (which is per-form-factor productization). Non-robotics companies cap at 25.
Reality vs attention
Not enough verified signal yet to place CloudHQ against peers. Reality and attention percentiles publish once the underlying record clears its data floor.
6-month trend
Analysis
Limited public visibility and press coverage relative to peers.
Dimension breakdown
Verified signal
Attention (reach, not merit)
DEPLOY Intelligence scores are computed from verified registry data: confirmed deployments, disclosed funding rounds, regulatory filings, active job listings, video viewership, and press coverage. Confidence ratings reflect data availability. Scores update nightly.
DEPLOY Indices — verified vs claimed
Last computed: Oct 4, 2026