Chip comparison
NVIDIA DRIVE Thor vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | NVIDIA DRIVE Thor | NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | TSMC 4NP | Samsung 8N |
| TDP | 130 W | 60 W |
| Memory | 128 GB LPDDR5X | 64 GB LPDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | — | 204.8 GB/s |
| FP8 (dense) | 2,000 TFLOPS | — |
| INT8 (dense) | 2,000 TOPS | 275 TOPS |
| Form factor | Auto-board | Module (AGX Orin 64GB) |
| Announced | 2022-09-20 | 2022-03-22 |
| Released | 2025-06-01 | 2022-07-01 |
Robots running NVIDIA DRIVE Thor
Robots running NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin
Data centers with NVIDIA DRIVE Thor
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Data centers with NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Common questions
NVIDIA DRIVE Thor vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin: which has more memory?
NVIDIA DRIVE Thor carries more HBM (NVIDIA DRIVE Thor: 128 GB LPDDR5X; NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin: 64 GB LPDDR5). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.
NVIDIA DRIVE Thor vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin: which is more widely used?
NVIDIA DRIVE Thor: 11 robots and 0 data centers publicly running it. NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin: 9 robots and 0 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.
See also: every chip comparison · NVIDIA DRIVE Thor full page · NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin full page.