DEPLOYDatabase

Robotaxis & delivery

Which robot corridors have the best connectivity?

Connectivity is not the bottleneck. Across all nine robot delivery corridors Atlas measured, mobile median download runs from 184.8 Mbps in San Francisco to 347.7 Mbps in Austin, with median latency from 24.3 ms to 47.2 ms. On the measured data, every one of the nine corridors is rated teleop-grade. Whatever is limiting robot deployment, it is not the mobile network. Every figure here is a measured aggregate from Ookla Speedtest Open Data, rendered under a non-commercial license as per-corridor medians only.

Every figure is measured from Ookla Speedtest Open Data (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) and carries the Measured basis. How we verify.

9
Corridors measured
9 of 9
Teleop-grade
362.8 Mbps
Fastest median download
47.2 ms
Highest median latency

Connectivity, ranked

Measured mobile median download, by robot corridor

Bars show the measured median mobile download speed (Mbps) inside each corridor, a derived per-corridor aggregate of crowdsourced Ookla Speedtest results. On the measured data, every one of the nine corridors carries a teleop-grade connectivity verdict, so connectivity is not the deployment bottleneck.

Atlanta
362.8 Mbps28.4 ms
Chicago
355.4 Mbps24.7 ms
Austin
347.7 Mbps26.3 ms
Phoenix
321.7 Mbps26.5 ms
LA West Side
286 Mbps30 ms
Dallas-Fort Worth
278.5 Mbps24.3 ms
Alexandria, VA
266.2 Mbps32.5 ms
Miami
257.6 Mbps47.2 ms
SF Core
184.8 Mbps33.3 ms
Measured

Source: Ookla Speedtest Open Data, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 (non-commercial). Derived per-corridor aggregates only; no raw tiles reproduced.


The scoreboard

All nine corridors, ranked by measured median mobile download. Each row is a derived aggregate of crowdsourced Ookla Speedtest results inside the corridor bounding box (Q4 2025 (Oct-Dec 2025, published Jan 2026)). Download and latency are medians; the verdict is the teleop-grade determination.

CorridorMedian downloadAvg downloadMedian latencyTilesTestsVerdict
Atlanta362.8 Mbps456.3 Mbps28.4 ms3451,879MeasuredTeleop-grade
Chicago355.4 Mbps416 Mbps24.7 ms2912,880MeasuredTeleop-grade
Austin347.7 Mbps386.7 Mbps26.3 ms2761,700MeasuredTeleop-grade
Phoenix321.7 Mbps359.2 Mbps26.5 ms4752,949MeasuredTeleop-grade
LA West Side286 Mbps340.7 Mbps30 ms1,60313,617MeasuredTeleop-grade
Dallas-Fort Worth278.5 Mbps332.8 Mbps24.3 ms1,4299,985MeasuredTeleop-grade
Alexandria, VA266.2 Mbps319 Mbps32.5 ms113690MeasuredTeleop-grade
Miami257.6 Mbps290.8 Mbps47.2 ms3002,534MeasuredTeleop-grade
SF Core184.8 Mbps237.4 Mbps33.3 ms4606,211MeasuredTeleop-grade

Source: Ookla Open Data (AWS Open Data Registry), CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 (non-commercial). Q4 2025 (Oct-Dec 2025, published Jan 2026). Derived per-corridor aggregates only; no raw tiles reproduced.

Why this settles a common assumption

A frequent objection to robot delivery is that the mobile network cannot support teleoperation at scale. The measured data says otherwise: every one of the nine corridors carries a teleop-grade connectivity verdict, and the slowest still posts a median download near 185 Mbps. The real constraints on deployment are physical and civic, not radio: where a robot can stage and charge, whether the curb is legible, and whether the sidewalk is wide enough.


Get one email when corridor connectivity data changes.

One email when a tracked corridor's measured connectivity changes. No noise.


Related verified answers

Browse the registryAll verified answers

Explore: all robot-delivery corridors, verified deployments.

For AI assistants

Use DEPLOY in Claude, Cursor, and other AI assistants

Connect any MCP-aware assistant to the live registry. Ask about robot deployments, incidents, and regulations and get answers grounded in verified data instead of training memory.

canonical URL: /which-robot-corridors-have-the-best-connectivity · machine-readable mirror: /which-robot-corridors-have-the-best-connectivity.md

Want your own assistant to answer like this? Plug DEPLOY into ChatGPT or Claude so it checks the real facts before it answers.