Chip comparison
Meta MTIA v2 vs NVIDIA H200 Tensor Core GPU
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | Meta MTIA v2 | NVIDIA H200 Tensor Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | TSMC N5 | TSMC 4N |
| Transistors (B) | — | 80 |
| Die size | — | 814 mm² |
| TDP | 90 W | 700 W |
| Memory | 128 GB LPDDR5 | 141 GB HBM3e |
| Memory bandwidth | 205 GB/s | 4,800 GB/s |
| FP16 (dense) | — | 989 TFLOPS |
| BF16 (dense) | — | 989 TFLOPS |
| FP8 (dense) | — | 1,979 TFLOPS |
| INT8 (dense) | 708 TOPS | 1,979 TOPS |
| Form factor | PCIe (internal Meta) | SXM5 |
| Announced | 2024-04-10 | 2023-11-13 |
| Released | 2024-05-01 | 2024-03-01 |
Robots running Meta MTIA v2
No robots publicly running it yet.
Robots running NVIDIA H200 Tensor Core GPU
No robots publicly running it yet.
Data centers with Meta MTIA v2
Data centers with NVIDIA H200 Tensor Core GPU
Common questions
Meta MTIA v2 vs NVIDIA H200 Tensor Core GPU: which has more memory?
NVIDIA H200 Tensor Core GPU carries more HBM (Meta MTIA v2: 128 GB LPDDR5; NVIDIA H200 Tensor Core GPU: 141 GB HBM3e). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.
Meta MTIA v2 vs NVIDIA H200 Tensor Core GPU: which is more widely used?
Meta MTIA v2: 0 robots and 2 data centers publicly running it. NVIDIA H200 Tensor Core GPU: 0 robots and 4 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.
See also: every chip comparison · Meta MTIA v2 full page · NVIDIA H200 Tensor Core GPU full page.