DEPLOYDatabase

Capabilities

Do farmers actually use robots?

Read live from the deployment record

Yes, on named farms in named places, and a real share of it is still trials. The record holds agricultural robots working on specific farms: laser weeders in the Salinas Valley, autonomous tractors in Iowa and Sao Paulo, vineyard robots in Saint-Emilion and Napa, seeding robots in Denmark, and cattle collars across New Zealand. What separates this from a vendor slide is that the registry marks each deployment's own status, so a pilot never reads as a rollout, and it records who published the evidence, so a claim resting only on the maker's own website is visible as one.

Last verified Apr 20, 202665 sources

Find out instantly when it changes.

Verified changes only. We check the record and link every source. No marketing.

Yes, and the honest version of the answer has three parts.

Where they are working. The record holds agricultural robots on named farms and in named regions: laser weeders across the Salinas Valley and other California growing areas, autonomous tractors in Iowa, Wisconsin and Sao Paulo, weeding and vineyard robots in Bordeaux, Saint-Emilion and Cognac, a seeding robot in Denmark, spot-spraying robots in Slovakia and East Anglia, strawberry-harvesting in Oxnard, and cattle-management collars across New Zealand. This is not one country's story.

How much is still a trial. A meaningful share of the record is pilots rather than rollouts, and the registry holds that distinction in each deployment's own status rather than leaving it to the reader. This page counts them separately and never folds a pilot into the in-use total. A small set of deployments have ended, which is also part of an honest answer: not every agricultural robot programme continued.

Who is saying so. Agricultural robotics is a heavily marketed field, and a good deal of the corpus is sourced to the maker's own website or press room. That is not disqualifying, but it is worth knowing, so each entry is tested against the maker's own name from the record and flagged when every source behind it sits on the manufacturer's own domain. The complement is described as not only the maker's own domain rather than as independent, because the record can prove the first and cannot prove the second.

What the record holds

Counted from the registry rather than asserted. Each entry is one machine in one lifecycle state; a machine deployed at several farms is held together rather than counted as several robots.

In use
18
In trials
6
Ended
2

26 entries, drawn from 42 reviewed deployment records across 21 machines and 18 makers at 37 distinct places. By record rather than by entry, 29 are in use, 9 are pilots and 4 have ended. 6 of the 42 records rest entirely on the maker’s own domain, and 8 carry no start date on the record, so they show as not yet on record rather than being given an invented one.

Three different claims, kept apart

Each column is attributed to what it actually describes. The third is the claim DEPLOY refuses to make.

What the record shows

Named machines on named farms

Every row is a reviewed deployment at a specific place: a growing region, a vineyard, an estate, a research farm. Each carries the registry's own status for that deployment and its own sources, read live at page load.

What separates this from a brochure

A pilot is counted as a pilot

The registry marks each deployment operational, scaled, pilot or ended, and this page keeps those totals apart. Folding trials into an in-use figure is the usual way this question gets answered dishonestly, and it is the thing the record makes it possible to avoid.

What DEPLOY will not claim

That the remaining sources are independent

An entry is flagged when every source behind it sits on the maker's own domain, which the record can prove from the company's own name. The rest are described only as not the maker's own domain: a customer's website or a press-release wire is neither the manufacturer nor a disinterested party.

In use on farms

What the registry marks operational or scaled, newest first. Each machine is described in its own model record’s words rather than characterised here.

Agricultural robots recorded as in use

Still in trials

Deployments the registry marks as pilots. They are counted in no in-use total, because a trial on one estate is a different claim from a machine in service.

Agricultural robots recorded as pilots

Programmes that ended

Part of an honest answer rather than an omission from one: not every agricultural robot deployment on the record continued.

Agricultural robot deployments recorded as ended
How we know this

Every machine on this page is a deployment record on the DEPLOY registry, read live at page load, with its own place, its own dated start where the record holds one, and its own sources. The split between in use, pilot and ended comes from each record's own status rather than from editorial judgement, and each machine is described in its own model record's words. Here are the sources behind them.

John DeereThe Western ProducerWSAW NewsChannel 7John Deere Precision AgIowa Farm BureauRadio IowaElectrekDeere & Company (official)CNBCSprayers101EcorobotixFarmers WeeklySolinftec Shares Stats from Solix Sprayer's First SeasonSolinftec to Release Solix Sprayer Robot for Precise Pesticide ApplicationAgFunderNewsFarmers ForumSolinftecSolinftec Announces Successful First Commercial Season of Solix Sprayer RobotSolinftecAgFunderNewsAgFunder NewsFuture FarmingMonarch TractorMonarch Tractor Launches Production of Founder Series MK-V Electric, Driver-Optional Smart TractorBusiness WireMonarch TractorMonarch TractorBusiness WireLaser Weeding Robots and Smart Sensors: How Braga Fresh Uses AI on the Farm | Agriculture DiveCarbon RoboticsGlobal Ag Tech InitiativeLaserWeeder Autonomous Weeding Robot | Carbon RoboticsInternational Wine ChallengeFarmwiseThe Robot ReportThe Robot ReportOrganic Produce NetworkFarm ProgressForbesAdvance QueenslandCNH IndustrialRaven Helps Drive CNH Industrial Autonomous Farming AmbitionsIron OxIron Ox Launches Grover, an All-New Autonomous Mobile Robot | PR NewswireBurroAutonomous Farm Robot Burro Assists Human Workers with Grape Harvest | VentureBeatNaïo TechnologiesOZ Weeding Robot | Naïo TechnologiesFarmdroidFarmDroid FD20 Autonomous Farming Robot | FarmDroidWine BusinessRural VoiceHermann J. Wiemer VineyardNaio TechnologiesUniversity of Guelph NewsBusiness WireMonarch TractorPerishable NewsSmall Robot CompanySmall Robot CompanyThe Robot ReportCustom Autonomous Tillage and Kits to Retrofit Tractors Drive CompanyAgFunder exit review: John Deere's $250M acquisition of Bear Flag RoboticsAutonomous tractors at work for Church Brothers FarmsDriverless tractor tech takes on Salinas

Sourcing is tested against each maker's own name from the record, so an entry resting entirely on the manufacturer's own domain is visible as one. DEPLOY reports the farms and regions its record documents; a place absent from this page is one the registry holds no reviewed deployment for, which is not a finding that no robots work there.

Common questions

What jobs do farm robots actually do?
On the record: weeding (Carbon Robotics' laser weeders and Naio's vineyard robots), spot-spraying (Ecorobotix ARA, Solinftec), autonomous tillage and field work (John Deere, CNH, Monarch Tractor), seeding (FarmDroid), crop harvesting (Advanced Farm's strawberry harvester), UV crop treatment (Saga Robotics' Thorvald), materials carrying in orchards and vineyards (Burro), and livestock management (Halter's smart collars). Each machine is described in its own model record's words on the page.
Are farm robots actually in use or just being tested?
Both, and the page counts them separately rather than blurring them. Deployments the registry marks operational or scaled are shown as in use; deployments marked pilot are shown as trials; deployments marked ended are shown as ended. Folding a pilot into an in-use total is the single most common way this question gets answered dishonestly.
Which countries have farming robots?
The record spans the United States (California, Iowa, Wisconsin, Indiana, New York), Brazil, France, the United Kingdom, Denmark, Canada, Slovakia, Australia and New Zealand. That is what the registry documents rather than a complete survey: a country absent from the page is one DEPLOY holds no reviewed deployment for, not one without agricultural robots.
Is this just marketing from the robot makers?
Some of it is the maker's own account, and the page says which. Every entry is tested against the maker's own name from the record, and an entry whose every source sits on the manufacturer's own domain is flagged. DEPLOY does not call the remainder independent, because a customer's own website or a press-release wire is not the maker's domain but is not disinterested either.
How many farms use robots?
DEPLOY does not publish that number and no honest one comes from this record. What the page reports is how many reviewed deployment records the registry holds and at how many distinct places, which is a floor rather than a market estimate. Several machines are deployed at more than one site, so a record count is not a farm count.

Keep reading

Ask the registry

Track this answer

Find out instantly when it changes.

Verified changes only. We check the record and link every source. No marketing.

Canonical URL: /do-farmers-actually-use-robots · machine-readable mirror: /do-farmers-actually-use-robots.md